Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Struggling with Table analysis questions on GMAT Data Insights? You're not alone! With typical accuracy rates hovering around 45% and average solving time of 3.25 minutes per question, Table analysis can be a real challenge.
We present a collection of 30 GMAT Focus practice questions covering Problem Solving, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, and Critical Reasoning. Take this GMAT practice quiz live with peers, analyze your GMAT study progress, and more.
Sayali narrates her experience of succeeding on the GMAT after 4 attempts & 2 years of preparations. Sayali achieved 99 percentile score on GMAT Focus edition after significantly improving her performance in verbal section of the GMAT
After just 3 months of studying with the TTP GMAT Focus course, Conner scored an incredible 755 (Q89/V90/DI83) on the GMAT Focus. In this live interview, he shares how he achieved his outstanding 755 (100%) GMAT Focus score on test day.
In this conversation with Ankit Mehra, IESE MBA and CEO & Co-Founder, of GyanDhan, we will discuss how prospective MBA students can finance their MBA education with education loans and scholarships.
What do András from Hungary, Pablo from Mexico, Conner from the United States, Giorgio from Italy, Leo from Germany, and Rishab from India have in common? They all earned top scores on the GMAT Focus Edition using the Target Test Prep course!
Ready to conquer GMAT's toughest Data Insights questions? Unlock the secrets of Graphical Interpretation & Two-Part Analysis with our expert-led webinar! Limited seats!
Join us for an exclusive one-day event focused on mastering the GMAT and maximizing your preparation resources! Here's what you can expect: Don't miss out on this invaluable opportunity to supercharge your GMAT preparation journey.
passage 27 since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe
[#permalink]
10 Mar 2004, 07:47
passage 27 since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe loss of
market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in
the united states have been trying to improve produc-
tivityтАФand therefore enhance their international
(5) competitivenessтАФthrough costтАФcutting programs. (cost-
cutting here is defined as raising labor output while
holding the amount of labor constant.) however, from
1978 through 1982, productivityтАФthe value of goods
manufactured divided by the amount of labor inputтАФ
(10) did not improve; and while the results were better in the
business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25
percent lower than productivity improvements during
earlier, post-1945 upturns. at the same time, it became clear
that the harder manufactures worked to imple-
(15) ment cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive
edge.
with this paradox in mind, i recently visited 25
companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting
approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally
(20) flawed. manufacturing regularly observes a "40, 40, 20"
rule. roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based
competitive advantage derives from long-term changes
in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number,
size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches
(25) to materials. another 40 percent comes from major
changes in equipment and process technology. the final
20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost-
cutting. this rule does not imply that cost-cutting should
not be tried. the well-known tools of this approachтАФ
(30) including simplifying jobs and retraining employees to
work smarter, not harderтАФdo produce results. but the
tools quickly reach the limits of what they can
contribute.
another problem is that the cost-cutting approach
(35) hinders innovation and discourages creative people. as
abernathy's study of automobile manufacturers has
shown, an industry can easily become prisoner of its
own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its
ability to develop new products. and managers under
(40) pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation
because they know that more fundamental changes in
processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on
which they are measured. production managers have
always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and
(45) maximizing output. this dimension of performance has
until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has
created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most
factories that has kept away creative managers.
every company i know that has freed itself from the
(50) paradox has done so, in part, by developing and imple-
menting a manufacturing strategy. such a strategy
focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equip-
ment and process technology. in one company a manu-
facturing strategy that allowed different areas of the
(55) factory to specialize in different markets replaced the
conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years
the company regained its competitive advantage.
together with such strategies, successful companies are
also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of
objectives besides cutting costs. there is hope for manufacturing,
but it clearly rests on a different way of managing.
1.the author of the passage is primarily concerned with
(a) summarizing a thesis
(b) recommending a different approach
(c) comparing points of view
(d) making a series of predictions
(e) describing a number of paradoxes
2. it can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturrs mentioned in line 2 expected that the measures they implemented would
(a) encourage innovation
(b) keep labor output constant
(c) increase their competitive advantage
(d) permit business upturns to be more easily predicted
(e) cause managers to focus on a wider set of objectives
3. the primary function of the first paragraph of the passage is to
(a) outline in brief the author's argument
(b) anticipate challenges to the prescriptions that follow
(c) clarify some disputed definitions of economic terms
(d) summarize a number of long-accepted explanations
(e) present a historical context for the author's observations
4. the author refers to abernathy's study (line 36) most probably in order to
(a) qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing
(b) address possible objections to a recommendation about improving manufacturing competitiveness
(c) support an earlier assertion about one method of increasing productivity
(d) suggest the centrality in the united states economy of a particular manufacturing industry
(e) given an example of research that has questioned the wisdom of revising a manufacturing strategy
5. the author's attitude toward the culture in most factories is best described as
(a) cautious
(b) critical
(c) disinterested
(d) respectful
(e) adulatory
6. in the passage, the author includes all of the following EXCEPT
(a) personal observation
(b) a business principle
(c) a definition of productivity
(d) an example of a successful company
(e) an illustration of a process technology
7. the author suggests that implementing conventional cost-cutting as a way of increasing manufacturing competitiveness is a strategy that is
(a) flawed and ruinous
(b) shortsighted and difficult to sustain
(c) popular and easily accomplished
(d) useful but inadequate
(e) misunderstood but promising
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: passage 27 since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe
[#permalink]
11 Mar 2004, 22:34
5. the author's attitude toward the culture in most factories is best described as (a) cautious (b) critical (c) disinterested (d) respectful (e) adulatory
Why the answer choice B is correct and not A?
7. the author suggests that implementing conventional cost-cutting as a way of increasing manufacturing competitiveness is a strategy that is
(a) flawed and ruinous
(b) shortsighted and difficult to sustain
(c) popular and easily accomplished
(d) useful but inadequate
(e) misunderstood but promising
The answer choice is B and not A because of the author's general disapproval with the cost-cutting methods employed by most factories. A sentence which exemplifies his feelings is this:
"with this paradox in mind, i recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally flawed."
That is very critical. I find no caution in his choice of words. Why do you think his tone was cautious? Being cautious implies that the writer does not use strong words which, as we can see from the above example, he in fact does.
Quote:
7. the author suggests that implementing conventional cost-cutting as a way of increasing manufacturing competitiveness is a strategy that is (a) flawed and ruinous (b) shortsighted and difficult to sustain (c) popular and easily accomplished (d) useful but inadequate (e) misunderstood but promising
Why the answer choice D is correct and not A?
I too initially selected A as the answer but with further analysis, I came out with D because the author stated that cost-cutting wasn't such a bad idea but that it shouldn't be the ONLY approach. His grouse was that managers did not entertain other possible ideas. Here is the statement that establishes D as the right answer:
"this rule does not imply that cost-cutting should not be tried. the well-known tools of this approachтАФ including simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harderтАФdo produce results. but the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute. "
Re: passage 27 since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe
[#permalink]
09 Nov 2007, 12:15
Can someone explain answers for questions 4 and 6?
4. the author refers to abernathy's study (line 36) most probably in order to
(a) qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing
(b) address possible objections to a recommendation about improving manufacturing competitiveness
(c) support an earlier assertion about one method of increasing productivity
(d) suggest the centrality in the united states economy of a particular manufacturing industry
(e) given an example of research that has questioned the wisdom of revising a manufacturing strategy
6. in the passage, the author includes all of the following EXCEPT
(a) personal observation
(b) a business principle
(c) a definition of productivity
(d) an example of a successful company
(e) an illustration of a process technology
Re: passage 27 since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe
[#permalink]
20 Dec 2007, 22:19
surat wrote:
passage 27 since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe loss of market share in dozens of industries, manufacturers in the united states have been trying to improve produc- tivityтАФand therefore enhance their international (5) competitivenessтАФthrough costтАФcutting programs. (cost- cutting here is defined as raising labor output while holding the amount of labor constant.) however, from 1978 through 1982, productivityтАФthe value of goods manufactured divided by the amount of labor inputтАФ (10) did not improve; and while the results were better in the business upturn of the three years following, they ran 25 percent lower than productivity improvements during earlier, post-1945 upturns. at the same time, it became clear that the harder manufactures worked to imple- (15) ment cost-cutting, the more they lost their competitive edge. with this paradox in mind, i recently visited 25 companies; it became clear to me that the cost-cutting approach to increasing productivity is fundamentally (20) flawed. manufacturing regularly observes a "40, 40, 20" rule. roughly 40 percent of any manufacturing-based competitive advantage derives from long-term changes in manufacturing structure (decisions about the number, size, location, and capacity of facilities) and in approaches (25) to materials. another 40 percent comes from major changes in equipment and process technology. the final 20 percent rests on implementing conventional cost- cutting. this rule does not imply that cost-cutting should not be tried. the well-known tools of this approachтАФ (30) including simplifying jobs and retraining employees to work smarter, not harderтАФdo produce results. but the tools quickly reach the limits of what they can contribute. another problem is that the cost-cutting approach (35) hinders innovation and discourages creative people. as abernathy's study of automobile manufacturers has shown, an industry can easily become prisoner of its own investments in cost-cutting techniques, reducing its ability to develop new products. and managers under (40) pressure to maximize cost-cutting will resist innovation because they know that more fundamental changes in processes or systems will wreak havoc with the results on which they are measured. production managers have always seen their job as one of minimizing costs and (45) maximizing output. this dimension of performance has until recently sufficed as a basis of evaluation, but it has created a penny-pinching, mechanistic culture in most factories that has kept away creative managers. every company i know that has freed itself from the (50) paradox has done so, in part, by developing and imple- menting a manufacturing strategy. such a strategy focuses on the manufacturing structure and on equip- ment and process technology. in one company a manu- facturing strategy that allowed different areas of the (55) factory to specialize in different markets replaced the conventional cost-cutting approach; within three years the company regained its competitive advantage. together with such strategies, successful companies are also encouraging managers to focus on a wider set of objectives besides cutting costs. there is hope for manufacturing, but it clearly rests on a different way of managing.
1.the author of the passage is primarily concerned with (a) summarizing a thesis (b) recommending a different approach (c) comparing points of view (d) making a series of predictions (e) describing a number of paradoxes
2. it can be inferred from the passage that the manufacturrs mentioned in line 2 expected that the measures they implemented would (a) encourage innovation (b) keep labor output constant (c) increase their competitive advantage (d) permit business upturns to be more easily predicted (e) cause managers to focus on a wider set of objectives
3. the primary function of the first paragraph of the passage is to (a) outline in brief the author's argument (b) anticipate challenges to the prescriptions that follow (c) clarify some disputed definitions of economic terms (d) summarize a number of long-accepted explanations (e) present a historical context for the author's observations
4. the author refers to abernathy's study (line 36) most probably in order to (a) qualify an observation about one rule governing manufacturing (b) address possible objections to a recommendation about improving manufacturing competitiveness (c) support an earlier assertion about one method of increasing productivity (d) suggest the centrality in the united states economy of a particular manufacturing industry (e) given an example of research that has questioned the wisdom of revising a manufacturing strategy
5. the author's attitude toward the culture in most factories is best described as (a) cautious (b) critical (c) disinterested (d) respectful (e) adulatory
6. in the passage, the author includes all of the following EXCEPT (a) personal observation (b) a business principle (c) a definition of productivity (d) an example of a successful company (e) an illustration of a process technology
7. the author suggests that implementing conventional cost-cutting as a way of increasing manufacturing competitiveness is a strategy that is (a) flawed and ruinous (b) shortsighted and difficult to sustain (c) popular and easily accomplished (d) useful but inadequate (e) misunderstood but promising
1B
2C
3E
4B
5B
6E
7A
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: passage 27 since the late 1970's, in the face of a severe [#permalink]