Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 00:10 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 00:10
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,987
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,408
Kudos: 778,417
 [20]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,793
Own Kudos:
5,514
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,793
Kudos: 5,514
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Lampard42
Joined: 22 Nov 2018
Last visit: 12 Dec 2020
Posts: 427
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 292
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V41
Posts: 427
Kudos: 552
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
emilycatharine
Joined: 29 May 2019
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kinshook
Bunuel
Spending on clothes in this country increased by 35% from 1970 to 1990. Over the same period, however, revenue from clothing sales actually made instores, whether retail or wholesale, only increased by 20% and most of that increase took place in national chain departmental stores.

Based on the above statements, which of the following is the most reasonable conclusion about the period from 1970 to 1990

A. There was an increase in spending on clothes that were purchased thru alternate channels, such as thru the mail or over the phone.

B. Spending on clothes decreased in those stores that were not national chain department stores

C. The spending increase was not caused by people buying more clothes, but by an increase in clothing prices, both in retail stores and in wholesale outlets.

D. Most of the increase in spending on clothing was the result of an increase in sales of high price items to a relatively small number of people.

E. Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores.


Spending on clothes in this country increased by 35% from 1970 to 1990. Over the same period, however, revenue from clothing sales actually made instores, whether retail or wholesale, only increased by 20% and most of that increase took place in national chain departmental stores.

There is a possibility that spending on clothes were done mostly through some other channel and not instores. That is why revenues are not equal to spendings for instores.

A. There was an increase in spending on clothes that were purchased thru alternate channels, such as thru the mail or over the phone.

B. Spending on clothes decreased in those stores that were not national chain department stores

C. The spending increase was not caused by people buying more clothes, but by an increase in clothing prices, both in retail stores and in wholesale outlets.

D. Most of the increase in spending on clothing was the result of an increase in sales of high price items to a relatively small number of people.

E. Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores.


Both A & E seem correct since both mention alternative channels.
But E seems more reasonable.

IMO E

E cannot be correct because it is too absolute of a statement and we do not know which specific divisions the sales came from, only that they did not all come through instore. Therefore, A must be correct.
avatar
Kanika3agg
Joined: 09 May 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2021
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
81
 [1]
Given Kudos: 75
Posts: 96
Kudos: 81
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Spending on clothes in this country increased by 35% from 1970 to 1990. Over the same period, however, revenue from clothing sales actually made instores, whether retail or wholesale, only increased by 20% and most of that increase took place in national chain departmental stores. [This stimuli shows a paradox. The spending on clothes increased by 35% but the increase in instores revenue was only 20%. So, extra 15% revenue must have been accounted somewhere.]

Conclusion can be that the sales was not done totally through instores but through some other channels too.

Based on the above statements, which of the following is the most reasonable conclusion about the period from 1970 to 1990?

A. There was an increase in spending on clothes that were purchased thru alternate channels, such as thru the mail or over the phone. - Inline with our thinking. Lets keep it.

B. Spending on clothes decreased in those stores that were not national chain department stores - We cant infer this from the stimulus.

C. The spending increase was not caused by people buying more clothes, but by an increase in clothing prices, both in retail stores and in wholesale outlets. - If this would have been the case, then the revenue would have been the same as was observed overall.

D. Most of the increase in spending on clothing was the result of an increase in sales of high price items to a relatively small number of people. - Cant infer this from stimulus anywhere

E. Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores. - This could be true but it becomes too definitive which becomes a problem.

Therefore, Answer A
User avatar
mggmat19
Joined: 25 Apr 2017
Last visit: 21 Aug 2024
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
Posts: 16
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Spending on clothes in this country increased by 35% from 1970 to 1990. Over the same period, however, revenue from clothing sales actually made instores, whether retail or wholesale, only increased by 20% and most of that increase took place in national chain departmental stores.

Based on the above statements, which of the following is the most reasonable conclusion about the period from 1970 to 1990

A. There was an increase in spending on clothes that were purchased thru alternate channels, such as thru the mail or over the phone.

B. Spending on clothes decreased in those stores that were not national chain department stores

C. The spending increase was not caused by people buying more clothes, but by an increase in clothing prices, both in retail stores and in wholesale outlets.

D. Most of the increase in spending on clothing was the result of an increase in sales of high price items to a relatively small number of people.

E. Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To draw the conclusion for the statements presented above, Most of the people must have picked up choices A and E, which answer the following questions:-

1) Why there was a difference between 35% raise in overall sales and 20% raise in the sales made through retail stores?
Answer- Choice A, which can be logically concluded.
2) Why sales in National chain stores increased?
Answer choice E, Which concludes that raise in sales in National departmental store chain is because of some other divisions. Still National stores were unable to boost their output to maximum 35%.

these thoughts made me incline toward answer choice A.
User avatar
dushyanta
Joined: 27 May 2015
Last visit: 06 Mar 2025
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
62
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 60
Kudos: 62
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Spending on clothes in this country increased by 35% from 1970 to 1990. Over the same period, however, revenue from clothing sales actually made instores, whether retail or wholesale, only increased by 20% and most of that increase took place in national chain departmental stores.

Based on the above statements, which of the following is the most reasonable conclusion about the period from 1970 to 1990

Ok so there is an increase in spending by 35 pc but revenue from specific places are only 20%, what could be the reason


A. There was an increase in spending on clothes that were purchased thru alternate channels, such as thru the mail or over the phone.
Yea.. that is what i was thinking.. there should be some alternate channels from where the purchase must have been made. Contender

B. Spending on clothes decreased in those stores that were not national chain department stores
Incorrect answer

C. The spending increase was not caused by people buying more clothes, but by an increase in clothing prices, both in retail stores and in wholesale outlets.
I dont care - Total amount of spending is what i care for - Out of scope

D. Most of the increase in spending on clothing was the result of an increase in sales of high price items to a relatively small number of people.
Again out of scope as C

E. Most of the clothing sales that did not take place in stores were made thru the mail order divisions of national department stores.[/quote]
Yeah that is Okay, but isnt the mail order division is part of national department store and that part of instores..

A is correct
User avatar
Wajeeh
Joined: 27 Sep 2018
Last visit: 03 Oct 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 17
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The only problem here is in the last sentence " the national chain department stores ” even choice A didn't explain anything about that sentence

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts