Question 1
The primary purpose of the passage is to
The passage opens by categorizing as misconceptions positive opinions of nuclear fusion power, and concludes by stating that existing power sources, and not nuclear fusion power, should continue to be used for now. Al of this amounts to the passage working to
(D) caution against uncritical embrace of nuclear fusion power as a major energy source
Question 2
It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following about the current state of public awareness concerning nuclear fusion power?
This question sends us to look in the passage for the parts relating to public awareness of fusion power. The term "
popular misconceptions" is key here: without even reading what these conceptions are, this term tells us the author views the public as being misinformed on the topic, and this confusion - we see from the first two sentences - relates to the scientific facts. This is exactly what C tells us:
The public's awareness of the scientific facts concerning nuclear fusion power is somewhat distorted and incomplete.
Question 2
The passage provides information that would answer which of the following questions?
In this question, we have to review the answer choices:
(A) What is likely to be the principal source of deuterium for nuclear fusion power?
We are told that there is an enormous quantity of deleterious in the ocean - Yes! (B) How much incidental radiation is produced in the deuterium-tritium fusion reaction?
nowhere is this stated(C) Why are scientists exploring the deuterium-tritium fusion reaction with such zeal?
while this phenomenon is mentioned, no reasons are given for it(D) Why must the tritium for nuclear fusion be synthesized from lithium?
while this phenomenon is mentioned, no reasons are given for it(E) Why dots the deuterium-tritium reaction yield both alpha particles and neutrons?
while this phenomenon is mentioned, no reasons are given for itQuestion 2
Which of the following statements concerning nuclear scientists is most directly suggested in the passage?
In this question, we have to review the answer choices:
(A) Nuclear scientists are not themselves aware of all of the facts surrounding the deuterium-tritium fusion reaction.
this is not stated, nor is it suggested: the criticism levied is against the public's perceptions, not of scientists(B) Nuclear scientists exploring the deuterium-tritium reaction have overlooked key facts in their eagerness to prove nuclear fusion practical.
this is not stated, nor is it suggested: the criticism levied is against the public's eagerness, not that of scientists(C) Nuclear scientists may have overestimated the amount of lithium actually available in the Earth's crust.
this is not stated, nor is it suggested (D) Nuclear scientists have not been entirely dispassionate in their investigation of the deuterium-tritium reaction.
we ARE told that scientists investigate this question with "zeal" - this means they are dispassionate! (E) Nuclear scientists have insufficiently investigated the lithium-to-tritium reaction in nuclear fusion.
this is not stated, nor is it suggested