Last visit was: 27 Apr 2024, 03:35 It is currently 27 Apr 2024, 03:35

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Tags:
Find Similar Topics  Add a Tag
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [210]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2014
Posts: 50
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [7]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V41
Send PM
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [3]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2015
Posts: 186
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [1]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: Netherlands
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
WE:Science (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
bb wrote:
jmikery wrote:
Quote:
Schools do look at your compensation history to determine if you will help or weigh them down in terms of your earning potential after graduation – they are interested to have you employed as fast and as lucratively as possible after graduation as that will boost their ranking, attracting better applicants, which in turn will make ranking even better – it is a never-ending cycle.


Hi bb,

On this point, how does having a low salary pre-MBA affect your candidacy? Does it help the candidate since the school can point to someone who worked in an emerging market for $15-20k a year and say they've increased their salary 5 fold to $100k a year or do they view those guys negatively since they can choose to work in emerging markets and drag down the average salary for all graduates or once potential employers see that they made $15-20k pre-MBA, they might lowball the candidates more than they would someone who was making $70k pre-MBA



Thank you for reading the post. I don't think you need to worry comparing yourself to an Investment banker in NYC but rather someone from your own country/background. It is about comparative pool. Same rule applies to your GPA - you are judged against your peers from same/similar school.


Hi bb,

So that means if one has a relatively high salary (due to higher education or more experience) then it might work against him/her? I didn't disclose my salary in one of my applications because of this.
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [4]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
greenzie wrote:
Quote:

Thank you for reading the post. I don't think you need to worry comparing yourself to an Investment banker in NYC but rather someone from your own country/background. It is about comparative pool. Same rule applies to your GPA - you are judged against your peers from same/similar school.


Hi bb,

So that means if one has a relatively high salary (due to higher education or more experience) then it might work against him/her? I didn't disclose my salary in one of my applications because of this.



That point is probably a bit beyond my expertise and I would ask an admissions consultant in the Ask Admissions Consultants forum. I think a high salary may be a strength, demonstrating your accomplishment.... doubt it will cast a negative light, unless of course the entire picture of your application is not adding up (the salary is a self-reported number and technically you can put anything you want until the background check verifies it and even in that case, some countries have laws prohibiting from verifying that data)
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2015
Posts: 64
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 117
GMAT 1: 680 Q45 V38
GMAT 2: 730 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.72
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Excellent post bb.

This came at just right time when I am needing to make such a tough call.

Thanks
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [2]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
IgboRobinHood wrote:
Excellent post bb.

This came at just right time when I am needing to make such a tough call.

Thanks



Thank you. This is only my perspective and very much welcome a different point of view. Feel free to share your thoughts or ideas about the choice and impact of scholarship on the decision. Good Luck!
avatar
Aringo Consultant
Joined: 22 May 2010
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [10]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
8
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
I am at Cornell and I would not definitely substitute HBS, Stanford, MIT, and Wharton for it even under full tuition scholarship. Perspective is everything in this game and some companies will not come to your campus if you are not in the top. This is a self-fulfilling prophecy, we have no one from MBB and MBB does not come here. Some offices come, but these are not top offices. If you come from McK, you will get into HBS, Stanford, almost everywhere. And an addition stamp will be HBS to your McK pedigree, so the cycle will always evolve to your advantage. There are still some people gaining internships for these, but anyhow it is not that easy. This is an insider's experience and impression. For others, it may be different. I am just sharing what I observe
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Mar 2014
Posts: 58
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V41
Send PM
Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
1
Kudos
[quote="bb"]

[*] Third, the loan money is disbursed around when the school starts and in 2 installments (in case you are new to student loans); if you front-load any expenses in your second year or second semester, you will have to wait for some time.[/

Could you open this a little bit please, I am new to student loans
avatar
Aringo Consultant
Joined: 22 May 2010
Posts: 84
Own Kudos [?]: 19 [4]
Given Kudos: 21
Send PM
Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
3
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Having said that, I still think that Cornell is among the best, as well hardest, in terms of the classes and MBA education. I have many friends in the top 5, so at least I can make a somewhat reasonable comparison with them. The thing is people at other schools find more time in prepping for their interviews while we are doing non-linear programming and simulations :P However, I can still say that I am content with my selection. I am just saying that if you are more into recruitment and do not want to learn too much (things that I learn may help me to get into a PhD program, but will not come in handy for a job interview, although there were times I used them interviews to brag :)), Cornell may not be the optimal choice. Lastly, I still interviewed with top high-tech and consulting companies, albeit not the best. Thanks Cornell :)
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2014
Posts: 89
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 750 Q46 V48
GPA: 3.47
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
1
Kudos
I'm curious, bb, how do you define the Top 10 and Top 20? They fluctuate every year and vary between rankings. So you're saying, for example, you'd only take Anderson over Haas if you had a full scholarship over Haas? And Darden over Tuck if you had a full scholarship at Darden? I am not convinced there's that much differentiation between the schools in the ~8 to ~16 range, nor between say Olin and Owen (Owen was 27 last year)
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [1]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
whitman wrote:
I'm curious, bb, how do you define the Top 10 and Top 20? They fluctuate every year and vary between rankings. So you're saying, for example, you'd only take Anderson over Haas if you had a full scholarship over Haas? And Darden over Tuck if you had a full scholarship at Darden? I am not convinced there's that much differentiation between the schools in the ~8 to ~16 range, nor between say Olin and Owen (Owen was 27 last year)



Thanks for reading and bring up 2 very good points. The post i wrote was quite ambitious in the sense that it is hard to speak in absoluteness but I was so sick of wishy-washy answers that I really tried to make it as concrete as possible:
1. Rankings - the latest release has been very non-typical and has undermined reputation of US news. It thew a wrench into my world and I am sticking with last year's rankings that US News confusingly titled 2016 and this year's are 2017.
2. Some of the wording was vague and I have adjusted it to read that better - in the sense that "Definitely would trade a top 10 MBA for a top 20 spot with a full scholarship" as opposed to "would only switch for a full scholarship as opposed to partial" The only one situation I can see is someone who had MBB or iBanking dream since they were 5 but not everyone in Top 5 gets those spots/jobs. It is a big gamble to play.

The question remains what is a Top 10 or a Top 20 and frankly it is a lot less clear now than a few weeks ago when I wrote this post because Top 20 was Anderson and Johnson and Top 10 was Booth, Kellogg and Tuck, but now Booth is #2, Olin is #21 and Stern is #20. So, how about we keep using last year's rankings or perhaps 5-year average...

What do you think? Do you have a table/matrix you would suggest?
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2014
Posts: 89
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [5]
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 750 Q46 V48
GPA: 3.47
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
3
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
bb, I don't have any thoughts that differ greatly from yours. I know you were trying to distill some complex calculations that incorporate a variety of factors that depend on unique situations into a basic matrix. I mostly agree that Harvard and Stanford are "just go" schools, although I would personally trade a full ride at a top 10 school for full sticker to Stanford or Harvard. Beyond those two, though, I think region and career goals plays a huge part, as you said. As you mentioned, if you're dead set on MBB or elite IB or whatever, go to the schools that give the best shot at that. As far as school breakdowns, I think of it really as being a top 9, with Haas and Tuck added to the M7, and schools 10 - 18 being roughly comparable, then 19 -30 or so being roughly comparable.

This provides an interesting proxy for what could be considered an elite business school. For McKinsey's Emerging Scholars program, you must be enrolled at one of the following schools to apply: Haas, Kellogg, Anderson, Ross, Booth, Kenan-Flagler, Columbia, Stern, Johnson, Wharton, Tuck, Stanford, Sloan, Fuqua, Darden, Harvard, Yale

I would add McCombs probably and call those my "top 20" (really 18) schools in your matrix. I don't think a full ride is needed to go from H/S to top 9, to top 18, to top 30 or whatever. I think a full ride at Johnson would be necessary to take you away from Haas if you want to work in the bay area, but if you want to work in NYC, then Johnson might actually be the better school. I think a 30% scholarship at Anderson might be enough to sway me from Haas if I wanted work in tech/California, as they both do well. But a full-ride at Anderson would be required to sway me from Columbia to sway me from if I wanted to do MBB on the east coast.

I know you acknowledge many nuances and probably all of these. I'm typing kind of hastily as my dinner cooks and frankly am wrestling with my own choice and trying to determine where I fall in all this.

Thanks for creating the thread.
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [1]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
I like the discussion and where it is headed - it is great to test my table on a real situation like yours, and your points gave me an interesting idea about complicating my chart, but for now, here is a question for you - what do you think would be an equal trade between a Top 10 (e.g. Sloan/Kellogg) and Top 20 (e.g. Johnson/Anderson). Is it 25%, 33%, 50% 66% 75% or 100% scholarship - without adding any regional or employment implications (which obviously tip scales in various ways) but if we were to just crudely isolate brand-names and rankings, what would it take to get you switch from Kellogg to Johnson for example? How much would it be?
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2014
Posts: 89
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 750 Q46 V48
GPA: 3.47
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
For me, with no geographical or industry preference, I'd put the figure around a 50% scholarship to drop from tier to tier. For example, I wanted to go to Haas, Anderson, or Foster, and had in my head that the roughly equivalent point for them would be no scholarship at Haas = ~$40,000 at Anderson = full ride at Foster. It turned out I got denied at Haas and Foster but got $60,000 at Anderson, but that was the matrix I had established for myself.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2015
Posts: 80
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Strategy
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V42
WE:Management Consulting (Health Care)
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
Very interesting article and thanks for putting it here. The whole decision making is a bit subjective, however, you have set the right direction here.

Of course, when you say that a full scholarship at top 20 may offset no scholarship at top 10, you clearly wouldn't take a full scholarship at Rank 19 over a no scholarship at rank 5.

I had to choose between Duke, Ross and Anderson with a mild preference for healthcare industry and strong preference for west coast. Given their average ranks (Duke 11/12, Ross 11/12, Anderson 15), and the total cost of attendance (living+tuition+travel),I estimated that Duke/Ross would be equal to Anderson + 30/40k. However, I got significantly more amount at Anderson made it an easy decision for me.
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [3]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
3
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
whitman wrote:
For me, with no geographical or industry preference, I'd put the figure around a 50% scholarship to drop from tier to tier. For example, I wanted to go to Haas, Anderson, or Foster, and had in my head that the roughly equivalent point for them would be no scholarship at Haas = ~$40,000 at Anderson = full ride at Foster. It turned out I got denied at Haas and Foster but got $60,000 at Anderson, but that was the matrix I had established for myself.


Pardon the delay - business trip got in the way.
Thank you for being open and taking a position. The more I have been applying some kind of a system, the more I have been wanting to change it but the new US News rankings have really messed the whole thing up. One of the ideas is to run trade off analysis on alums/graduates and check their perception and then do the same for applicants and run 10-20 simulations on each, establishing the exact value and position of each school.

You have definitely motivated me to complicate the system:
I like the concept of diminishing returns (less linear system such as a diminishing difference such as:
HBS vs Top 10 - 100% scholarship to be on par but perhaps only 75 or 50% to be on par with top 5.
Top 5 vs. Top 15 - 50% scholarship to be on par (which means each position is wroth 5% of scholarship)
Top 15 vs. Top 25 - 40% scholarship (each position is worth 4% of scholarship money)
Top 25 vs. Top 35 - 20% scholarship (each position is worth 2% of scholarship money)
Top 35 vs. Top 45 - 12%, and so on.

Just need to build a chart and perhaps come up with an equation.
Then there are variables such as staying within the same industry or targeting a region the school is strong - that should be a reduction of 10% scholarship perhaps to make it equitable (anyone feels it should be more)?
If staying within the same industry, then probably another 10% reduction?

Thanks for your ideas and your Anderson post - they are this a better post.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2015
Status:Done with applications.
Affiliations: MBB Consultant
Posts: 119
Own Kudos [?]: 45 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Operations, Organizational Behavior
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.8
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Very interesting discussion, thank you bb for having ignited it.

Another aspect I would add to the intangible is the overall experience during the actual MBA, such as workload and social life of each school. As a MBB consultant, doing a MBA is almost certain and when it comes to decide where to attend, social life is an important factor as many sponsored students consider these two years to be some sort of "vacation" from constant traveling and long working hours.

Having a prestigious brand on top of the MBB is certainly a plus, but many colleagues have made the decision to pursue more lifestyle-oriented schools because they wanted to fully enjoy those two years. As an example, I do know people who have decided not to apply to HBS because of the workload or that said that not having classes on Fridays was one of the best things of attending Wharton. Not sure how to quantify it though.
Founder
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 37319
Own Kudos [?]: 72896 [0]
Given Kudos: 18870
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Send PM
Re: Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
Expert Reply
mfprado1073 wrote:
Very interesting discussion, thank you bb for having ignited it.

Another aspect I would add to the intangible is the overall experience during the actual MBA, such as workload and social life of each school. As a MBB consultant, doing a MBA is almost certain and when it comes to decide where to attend, social life is an important factor as many sponsored students consider these two years to be some sort of "vacation" from constant traveling and long working hours.

Having a prestigious brand on top of the MBB is certainly a plus, but many colleagues have made the decision to pursue more lifestyle-oriented schools because they wanted to fully enjoy those two years. As an example, I do know people who have decided not to apply to HBS because of the workload or that said that not having classes on Fridays was one of the best things of attending Wharton. Not sure how to quantify it though.



Thank you for your suggestions! That's even harder than the challenges I am facing with my little numbers-based model. I am trying to figure those out first (waiting for a chunk of time to get it out of the way in one sitting). As to school on Fridays, many BSchools (majority perhaps?) do not have those - those days are often reserved for the painful group meetings, social events/activities, networking, etc.... so yes, most bschools have 3-day weekends. I think HBS is somewhat "special" in that sense.
VP
VP
Joined: 08 Apr 2009
Posts: 1186
Own Kudos [?]: 765 [4]
Given Kudos: 20
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Duke (Fuqua) - Class of 2012
Send PM
Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
2
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
bb wrote:
Thanks for reading and bring up 2 very good points. The post i wrote was quite ambitious in the sense that it is hard to speak in absoluteness but I was so sick of wishy-washy answers that I really tried to make it as concrete as possible:
1. Rankings - the latest release has been very non-typical and has undermined reputation of US news. It thew a wrench into my world and I am sticking with last year's rankings that US News confusingly titled 2016 and this year's are 2017.
2. Some of the wording was vague and I have adjusted it to read that better - in the sense that "Definitely would trade a top 10 MBA for a top 20 spot with a full scholarship" as opposed to "would only switch for a full scholarship as opposed to partial" The only one situation I can see is someone who had MBB or iBanking dream since they were 5 but not everyone in Top 5 gets those spots/jobs. It is a big gamble to play.

The question remains what is a Top 10 or a Top 20 and frankly it is a lot less clear now than a few weeks ago when I wrote this post because Top 20 was Anderson and Johnson and Top 10 was Booth, Kellogg and Tuck, but now Booth is #2, Olin is #21 and Stern is #20. So, how about we keep using last year's rankings or perhaps 5-year average...

What do you think? Do you have a table/matrix you would suggest?

I may be dating myself a bit. bb, I'm surprise you didn't pull out Hjort's cluster ranking :-) . It's a bit dated, and schools probably moved around a bit since.

I have a love-hate relationship with rankings. I think sometimes people get too caught up in absolutes and minor differences. Ranking is only useful to compare say #10 to #25. #10 is probably better than #25 on 90% of things (BMW is better than Mitsubishi). To compare #10 to #14 would be more difficult (is BMW better than Mercedes-Benz?). This is where segmentation comes in (if you like luxury, go with MB, if you like performance go with BMW). Even then, there are other factors: industry/company strength, location, etc. (AMG will destroy regular BMW).

From a nerdier perspective, the fact rankings do not fluctuate greatly is either designer genius or data manipulation. Seeing how different rankings (BW vs. USNews) views schools very differently probably defeat the designer genius theory. If my memory serves me well, I believe US News scales ratings to a 100 point scale. With few hundred schools, the schools must be clustered so tightly, especially at the lower end (less known/visible schools), that a statistically insignificant variation would cause wild swings in ranking. Alas, journalists are not statisticians. So they wrap the truth in the most credible manner.

Other food for thought:
Why top 10, and not top 11? Or top 9?
What is better? Do you define it by exit salary? Or incoming GMAT? Or ROI? Or famous alumni?
GMAT Club Bot
Value of a Top 10 MBA [Long Post] [#permalink]
 1   2   3   4   
Moderator:
Admitted - Which School Forum Moderator
1131 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne