plaverbach wrote:
Several unanswered questions, mine is about Q2
There are more cougars in Florida than there are in Minnesota.
Excessive hunting has been the primary cause of the population decrease in cougars across its entire habitat.
In Florida, cougar attacks on humans are more likely now than they were several decades ago.
Hi
plaverbach,
Let me know if this helps.
Quote:
(A) There are more cougars in Florida than there are in Minnesota.
A is incorrect, as it's not mentioned anywhere in the passage. Even if we consider the lines: "In particular, the cougar was extirpated in eastern North America in the beginning of the 20th century, except for an isolated subpopulation in Florida. However, in recent decades, breeding populations have moved east into the far western parts of the Dakotas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. Transient males have been verified in Minnesota", we cannot infer if there are more cougars in Florida than there are in Minnesota.
Quote:
(B) Excessive hunting has been the primary cause of the population decrease in cougars across its entire habitat.
B is incorrect, as even though mentioned: "Excessive hunting following European colonization of the Americas and the ongoing human development of cougar habitat has caused populations to drop in most parts of its historical range.", we cannot infer if this was the fundamental cause of the population decrease in cougars.
Quote:
(C) In Florida, cougar attacks on humans are more likely now than they were several decades ago.
Consider the lines: "It is reclusive and mostly avoids people, so fatal attacks on humans are rare but have been trending upward in certain areas during recent years as more people enter their territory.". Here again, we cannot infer this being specifically mentioned with respect to Florida. Hence, C is incorrect as well.
Thanks.