Regor60 wrote:
Gmatguy007 wrote:
For my first question that's what I meant.
Quote:
So, drawings from the first scenario do not reduce the pool for the second, since they are alternative ways of achieving the objective.
For the second query, selecting 0 defectives is the left bar with prob = 2/7 and selecting 1 is the middle with prob = 4/7.
Since it has to be equal, if we double the middle one then they'll be 2/7 for the left column and 8/7 for the middle. So we have to divide by 2 (or in other words multiply by k=1/2) the middle one so as to be both 2/7 which satisfies the condition that the right one (1/7) is half of the other two.
Quote:
Since the actual probability for selecting 0 defectives is 2/7 and for 1 defective 4/7, the bar in the middle needs to be doubled.
Ok I see.
You have truth and the representation of truth (chart) mixed up.
Truth is 2/7, 4/7 and 1/7, as borne out by the calculations.
The chart is attempting to represent the above.
What about the chart is incorrect and what needs to be done ?
The first and second bars are the same height, indicating the same probability for each, not correct.
We can halve the first bar so that the relationship is corrected.
But then the 1st and 3rd bars would be the same height, suggesting equal probability, which we know isn't correct.
So, if we double the 2nd bar instead, it will indicate twice the probability of the first and four times that of the third, all of which correctly represents the true probabilities.
Posted from my mobile device Hang on a sec, let's take a step back.
We know from the stem that the left and middle bars have to be equal in length (so equal probabilities) and at the same time the right one must be exactly half of the other two. We are also aware that there is a mistake in one of these lengths and we try to spot and correct it. Lastly, we know that the left bar depicts the probability to select 0 defectives, the middle one the probability to choose 1 defective and the right the probability to pick 2 defectives. We calculated these probabilities and we see that:
Prob (0 defect) = 2/7 = p1
Prob (1 defect) = 4/7 = p2
Prob (2 defect) = 1/7 = p3
In order to satisfy the conditions I mentioned earlier it must be true that:
(1) p1 = p2 => 2/7 = 4/7 AND (2) p3 = 1/2*p1 = 1/2*p2
We can conclude that the first condition can be satisfied if we multiply the p1 by k = 2 or multiply the p2 by k=1/2.
If we choose the first one, then the second condition is incorrect since it becomes
1/7 = 1/2*(2*2/7) = 1/2*4/7 = 2/7 , whereas if we choose the second one then the condition No2 is valid since it becomes
1/7 = (1/2)*(1/2)*(4/7) = 1/7.So, why is it wrong to multiply the middle bar by 1/2 since, as it seems above, it provides the results we want contrary to those when we multiply the middle bar by 2?